- Data Note
- Open Access
Large-scale analysis of the evolutionary histories of phosphorylation motifs in the human genome
GigaScience volume 4, Article number: 21 (2015)
Protein phosphorylation is a post-translational modification that is essential for a wide range of eukaryotic physiological processes, such as transcription, cytoskeletal regulation, cell metabolism, and signal transduction. Although more than 200,000 phosphorylation sites have been reported in the human genome, the physiological roles of most remain unknown. In this study, we provide some useful datasets for the assessment of functional phosphorylation signaling using a comparative genome analysis of phosphorylation motifs.
We described the evolutionary patterns of conservation of these and comparative genomic data for 93,101 phosphosites and 1,003,756 potential phosphosites in human phosphomotifs, using 178 phosphomotifs identified in a previous study that occupied 69% of known phosphosites in public databases. Comparative genomic analyses were performed using genomes from nine species from yeast to humans. Here we provide an overview of the evolutionary patterns of phosphomotif acquisition and indicate the dependence on motif structures. Using the data from our previous study, we describe the interaction networks of phosphoproteins, identify the kinase substrates associated with phosphoproteins, and perform gene ontology enrichment analyses. In addition, we show how this dataset can help to elucidate the function of phosphomotifs.
Our characterizations of motif structures and assessments of evolutionary conservation of phosphosites reveal physiological roles of unreported phosphosites. Thus, interactions between protein groups that share motifs are likely to be helpful for inferring kinase-substrate interaction networks. Our computational methods can be used to elucidate the relationships between phosphorylation signaling and cellular functions.
Utility of the dataset
Protein phosphorylation has an important role in a wide variety of cellular functions , and previous large-scale mass spectrometry studies have identified >100,000 phosphosites [2,3]. These phosphosites mostly represent modifications with unknown physiological functions, precluding identification of which ones are physiologically important. Nonetheless, 518 protein kinases have been reported in the human genome and, because various kinases are targeted to specific sequence motifs in the surrounding regions of phosphosites, such phosphorylation motifs have been extensively characterized . Here, we have determined the functions of phosphorylation signaling pathways in cellular processes. We have also investigated the relationships between 178 phosphomotifs and cellular functions, and evolutionary conservation . Our analyses indicate that highly conserved phosphomotifs are likely to be involved in similar signaling networks with functionally important roles. We describe the sequences and evolutionary conservation of 93,101 known phosphosites and 1,003,756 potential phosphosites from the human genome (Additional file 1 and Raw_Data_All_Motif_Seq.txt in GigaDB ). This information is expected to be helpful for linking phosphorylation signaling networks to physiological functions and for assessing functional importance. Therefore, we provide information about the kinases that phosphorylate them, the interaction networks of proteins with the same motif, and we find the associations between the motifs and the biological functions. We show that this dataset can help to elucidate the function of phosphomotifs and their role in cellular signaling by showing how they evolved. Furthermore, we show information about the evolutionary conservation of phosphosites with known kinase-substrate relationships, and the ortholog conservation of each kinase. Finally, we show that the evolutionary conservation of phosphomotifs is not likely to be correlated with the ortholog conservation of the kinases.
Definition of the phosphomotif conservation index
In a previous study, we identified 178 phosphomotifs  and investigated the evolutionary conservation of the phosphosites in each motif to elucidate the physiological roles of the identified motifs. To evaluate evolutionary conservation, we selected model organisms with rich genome information, as follows: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Danio rerio, Canis familiaris, Mus musculus, Pan troglodytes, and Homo sapiens. Subsequently, the phosphorylation sites defined by Beltrao et al.  and Minguez et al.  were extracted, along with those from the PHOSHIDA database  and the dbPTM 3.0 database , including databases such as Phospho.ELM , HPRD , and the PhosphoSitePlus database [13,14], which were downloaded on 12 November 2014 (Additional file 1). Orthologous gene sets were generated from the KEGG ortholog clusters (OCs) for the nine species . For each OC, multiple sequence alignments were constructed using the freely available, rapid, and reliable multiple alignment tool MAFFT . MAFFT was run with the “-auto” option for the automatic selection of optimal parameters. Sequence regions with precisely matched known phosphomotifs were then identified from all of the species, and species conservation was evaluated with respect to known and potential phosphorylation sites. Potential phosphosites were defined as all serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues (STY residues) in human proteins harboring known phosphosites. The conservation rates were then calculated for all of the known and potential phosphosites in the nine species, and the conservation rates for each phosphomotif were defined as the number of phosphosites conserved in a species divided by the number of phosphosites observed in the human genome. To determine the differences between the known and potential phosphosites, conservation indices (CIs) were calculated as the sum of the difference between the conservation rate of a phosphosite in a motif (C) and the reference conservation rate (R) of the corresponding amino acid residue obtained from all human proteins. CIs were calculated using the following equation:
where G denotes the set of genomes used in the study, q denotes the index of a genome selected from G, and Cq and Rq are the conservation and reference conservation rates in q, respectively.
The CIs in each phosphomotif were compared between known phosphosites and all STY residues. Importantly, these comparisons support the recently reported tendencies of highly phosphorylated sites to be more conserved than less phosphorylated sites . Moreover, known phosphosites showed higher conservation in most phosphomotifs than in all of the STY residues (Figure 1 and Additional file 2). However, some phosphosites showed similar or lower CIs than known phosphosites. Moreover, these poorly conserved phosphomotifs were likely to include S/T-P amino acid sequences. In contrast, arginine-rich sequences in highly conserved phosphomotifs, such as R-X-X-S/T, tended to reside in the anterior region of the motif (Figure 2 and Additional file 3). Our analyses of the motif structures surrounding phosphosites suggest highly variable evolutionary conservation of phosphomotifs and dependence on motif structures.
Evolutionary conservation and expansion of kinases
Identification of the kinases involved in the phosphorylation of the motifs we identified allows inferences to kinases that bind protein substrates with these motif structures. To investigate the correlations between CIs and the kinase families of these motifs, data describing the relationships between kinases and substrates were extracted from PhosphoSitePlus [13,14]. Next, protein kinases that phosphorylate S/T-P, R-X-X-S/T, and R-X-S/T sequence patterns were identified. Most S/T-P sites (86%) were phosphorylated by kinases in the CMGC family, and more than 80% of the phosphomotifs harboring anterior arginine residues and lacking proline were phosphorylated by kinases of AGC and CAMK families (Table 1 and Additional file 4). These results suggest that ST-P is subject to phosphorylation by CMGC kinases, whereas R-X-X-S/T sites are more likely to be phosphorylated by AGC kinases. Thus, the phosphorylation substrates of AGC may be more highly conserved than those of the CMGC family. To confirm this hypothesis, we have calculated the evolutionary conservation of phosphosites with the reported kinase-substrate binding and CIs for each kinase family (Figure 3A and Additional file 5). In these analyses the substrate conservation of AGC kinases was greater than that of the CMGC kinases in all of the species.
A previous report has shown that numbers of CMGC kinases have occurred during the early evolution of vertebrates . Thus, to investigate the correlations of the CMGC kinase substrate conservation with the evolutionary expansion of kinases, changes in the numbers of kinases in the kinase groups were calculated using orthologs of kinases defined in KEGG. The proportion of AGC and CMGC kinases among all of the kinases did not differ between human and worm genomes (Figure 3B and Additional file 6), suggesting that numbers of AGC and CMGC kinases increased in vertebrates. Hence, conservation of phosphosites may reflect the types of kinases rather than the evolutionary changes in the numbers of expressed kinases. Thus, to facilitate the development of phosphomotif prediction tools, such as Scansite and Netphorest [19,20], we determined the evolutionary conservation of these phosphosites and defined the kinase-substrate relationships, CIs for each kinase family, and kinase orthologs.
Interaction networks of proteins with assigned phosphorylation motifs
Interactions between proteins with the same motif were more likely than reconstructed interactions between randomly selected proteins, allowing enrichment of proteins with similar physiological functions . Hence, identification of protein networks with the same motifs may facilitate characterizations of phosphorylation interaction networks based on kinase-substrate relationships and may be used to determine the ensuing physiological functions. To identify the associations between motif-associated proteins, data describing intermolecular interactions were downloaded from BioGRID (2.0.58)  and STRING (v8.2) , and the interactions of proteins with known motifs were extracted. The free open-source software application Cytoscape  was then used to visualize and analyze networks  and to construct network visualizations of our data (phospho-signal_network.cys in GigaDB ). Network visualization required the use of Cytoscape version 3.0 or above.
Gene ontology enrichment analysis
We have previously identified  the likely functional correlations between a wide variety of phosphomotifs, warranting the characterization of phosphomotifs with functional categories, such as gene ontology (GO), to confirm the physiological functions of the ensuing phosphorylation signaling. Thus, correlations between extracted phosphorylation motifs and specific physiological protein functions were identified here using functional enrichment analysis based on GO (Additional file 7). In these analyses, GO annotations were extracted for human proteins with known phosphorylation sites. Subsequently, annotations at the known motif level were assigned on the basis of the GO biological processes for proteins with the motif, and motif functions were identified using enrichment analysis with GoMiner . Significant GO annotations were extracted with cutoffs of FDR = 0.01 and p < 0.01.
Availability of supporting data
Datasets supporting the results of this study are available in the GigaScience repository, GigaDB . The data derived from PhosphoSitePlus is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Search Tool for Recurring Instances of Neighboring Genes
Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science. 2002;298(5600):1912–34.
Linding R, Jensen LJ, Ostheimer GJ, van Vugt MA, Jorgensen C, Miron IM, et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell. 2007;129(7):1415–26.
Gnad F, Ren S, Cox J, Olsen JV, Macek B, Oroshi M, et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol. 2007;8(11):R250.
Ubersax JA, Ferrell Jr JE. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8(7):530–41.
Yoshizaki H, Okuda S. Elucidation of the evolutionary expansion of phosphorylation signaling networks using comparative phosphomotif analysis. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):546.
Yoshizaki H, Okuda S: Supporting data and materials for “Large-scale analysis of evolutionary histories of phosphorylation motifs in the human genome”. GigaScience Database 2015, http://doi.org/10.5524/100136.
Beltrao P, Albanese V, Kenner LR, Swaney DL, Burlingame A, Villen J, et al. Systematic functional prioritization of protein posttranslational modifications. Cell. 2012;150(2):413–25.
Minguez P, Parca L, Diella F, Mende DR, Kumar R, Helmer-Citterich M, et al. Deciphering a global network of functionally associated post-translational modifications. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:599.
Gnad F, Gunawardena J, Mann M. PHOSIDA 2011: the posttranslational modification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D253–60.
Lee TY, Huang HD, Hung JH, Huang HY, Yang YS. Wang TH: dbPTM: an information repository of protein post-translational modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D622–7.
Dinkel H, Chica C, Via A, Gould CM, Jensen LJ, Gibson TJ, et al. Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites–update. Nucleic Acids Res 2011. 2011;39(Database issue):D261–7.
Keshava Prasad TS, Goel R, Kandasamy K, Keerthikumar S, Kumar S, Mathivanan S, et al. Human Protein Reference Database–2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D767–72.
Hornbeck PV, Kornhauser JM, Tkachev S, Zhang B, Skrzypek E, Murray B, et al. PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D261–70.
Nakaya A, Katayama T, Itoh M, Hiranuka K, Kawashima S, Moriya Y, et al. KEGG OC: a large-scale automatic construction of taxonomy-based ortholog clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D353–7.
Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.
Landry CR, Levy ED, Michnick SW. Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. TIG. 2009;25(5):193–7.
Li M, Liu J, Zhang C. Evolutionary history of the vertebrate mitogen activated protein kinases family. PLoS One. 2011;6(10), e26999.
Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB. Scansite 2.0: Proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3635–41.
Miller ML, Jensen LJ, Diella F, Jorgensen C, Tinti M, Li L, et al. Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Sci Signal. 2008;1(35):ra2.
Chatr-Aryamontri A, Breitkreutz BJ, Heinicke S, Boucher L, Winter A, Stark C, et al. The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D816–23.
Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D561–8.
Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Lotia S, et al. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods. 2012;9(11):1069–76.
Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G, Wang MD, Fojo AT, Sunshine M, et al. GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol. 2003;4(4):R28.
KEGG BRITE Database. http://www.genome.jp/kegg/brite_ja.html.
KEGG SSDB Database. http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/ssdb/.
Lehmann S, Bass JJ, Szewczyk NJ. Knockdown of the C. elegans kinome identifies kinases required for normal protein homeostasis, mitochondrial network structure, and sarcomere structure in muscle. CCS. 2013;11:71.
Harris TW, Baran J, Bieri T, Cabunoc A, Chan J, Chen WJ, et al. WormBase 2014: new views of curated biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D789–93.
We would like to thank Toshiya Hayano and Etsuko Kiyokawa for their help and discussion. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) and (B) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) (Research Project Number:26700029 and 24770190), Uehara Memorial Foundation Fellowship, and the Program for Research of Young Scientists from Ritsumeikan University.
The authors declare no competing interests.
HY conceived the study, conducted the experiments, performed the data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. SO contributed to the study’s conception, performed the bioinformatics analyses, and wrote the manuscript. HY and SO read and approved the final manuscript.
Hisayoshi Yoshizaki and Shujiro Okuda contributed equally to this work.
Additional file 1:
Additional file 2:
Data used to generate Figure1. Data 2–1: All of the defined phosphomotifs, including phosphomotif patterns and CIs of phosphomotifs possessing known phosphorylation residues and all STY residues. Data 2–2: Data used for calculation of CIs based on all STY residues. The conservation rate C is defined as the conservation fraction of each species relative to that for all human phosphosites that were grouped as a motif. Column C-R indicates the difference between C and the reference conservation rate R of the corresponding amino acid residue with the central residues of a motif (S/T/Y/ST) from all human proteins. CIs were calculated as the sum of values in the C-R column, and the CI in this table reflects CIs based on all STY residues in the human genome. Data 2–3: This table is the same as Data 2–2 except that the CI calculations are based on known phosphosites.
Additional file 3:
Data used to generate Figure2. Data 3: Defined phosphomotifs are presented in descending order of CIs and the successive sets of ten motifs from the top are grouped. Average CIs were then calculated for each group, and R/K and P types were counted. The R/K type is defined as motifs with R or K residues located at positions from −4 to −2 (blue), and the P type is defined as motifs with P residues located at position 1 (black).
Additional file 4:
Data used to generate Table1. Data 4–1: Relationships between phosphorylation motifs and respective protein kinases. Numbers of known phosphosites in each phosphomotif are shown. Among these phosphosites the numbers of phosphosites with defined kinase-substrate relationships in public databases are shown and the fractions of kinase families are calculated: the top five fractions are shown and phosphomotifs with fewer than ten kinase-substrate relationships are omitted. Data 4–2: Relationships between the phosphorylation motifs and their respective protein kinases. Annotations of kinase group names were determined on the basis of known kinase-substrate relationships from the phosphorylation database PhosphositePlus [13,14]. Data 4–3: List of kinase groups.
Additional file 5:
Data used to generate Figure 3A. Data 5–1: Data for calculation of CIs for kinase groups. CIs were calculated for each kinase group using the method that was used to calculate the CIs in phosphomotifs. Ref indicates a conservation rate of all serine and threonine residues of the human genome. Data 5–2: List of phosphorylation substrates and respective kinases. Uniprot identifiers for phosphorylation substrates, respective kinases, positions, residues, and sequences of phosphosites are listed. The conservation parameter indicates the most distant species (KEGG three letter organism code) from human with a conserved phosphosite. Kinase groups are defined according to PhosphoSitePlus [13,14].
Additional file 6:
Data used to generate Figure 3B. Data 6: Evolutionary expansions of kinase groups among 371 kinases, nine kinase groups were classified and extracted from PhosphoSitePlus [13,14] and KEGG BRITE . Orthologs of the kinases in the genomes hsa, mmu, dre, dme, and cel were assigned according to the KEGG SSDB homology database  and the kinase groups were assigned according to PhosphoSitePlus. hsa, Homo sapiens; mmu, Mus musculus; dre, Danio rerio; dme, Drosophila melanogaster; cel, Caenorhabditis elegans.
Additional file 7:
Clustering of enriched GO annotation profiles in phosphomotifs. Biological processes in the GO annotations were used and profiles were clustered based on Euclidean distance using Ward’s method. Pink indicates that annotations were present; black indicates the absence of annotations. Functional categories listed on the left hand side of the table are based on functions that are associated with GO biological processes. See also the GoMiner directory in GigaDB .
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Yoshizaki, H., Okuda, S. Large-scale analysis of the evolutionary histories of phosphorylation motifs in the human genome. GigaSci 4, 21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-015-0057-6
- Phosphorylation motif
- Comparative evolutionary analysis