Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Lessons learned from implementing a national infrastructure in Sweden for storage and analysis of next-generation sequencing data

Original Submission
20 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guy Coates
18 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Lonie
15 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ola Spjuth
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guy Coates
2 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Lonie
26 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ola Spjuth
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ola Spjuth
Resubmission - Version 5
19 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ola Spjuth
Resubmission - Version 6
21 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ola Spjuth
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
25 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/2047-217X-2-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page