Table 2 Comparison of percentage of admixed ancestry results
A. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | 2-ancestor model | 3-ancestor model | |||
Putatively admixed group | Coyote | Wolf | Coyote | Wolf | Dog |
Red wolf (n = 12) | 76.1 (144) | 23.9 (184) | -- | -- | -- |
Algonquin wolf (n = 2) | 41.9 (100) | 58.1 (100) | -- | -- | -- |
Great Lakes wolf (n = 12) | 14.9 (298) | 85.1 (230) | -- | -- | -- |
Northeastern coyote (n = 13) | -- | -- | 82.2 (96) | 8.7 (51) | 9.1 (16) |
Midwestern coyote (n = 19) | -- | -- | 90.1 (75) | 2.4 (140) | 7.5 (15) |
B. | |||||
Switch value | Red wolf (n = 12) | Algonquin wolf (n = 2) | Great Lakes wolf (n = 12) | Northeastern coyote (n = 13) | Midwestern coyote (n = 19) |
| Â | 2-ancestor model | 3-ancestor model | |||
0.5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Coyote | 66.9 | 52.8 | 41.9 | 71.2 | 76.4 |
Wolf | 33.1 | 47.2 | 58.1 | 17.4 | 13.4 |
Dog | ---- | ---- | ---- | 11.5 | 10.2 |
1.0 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Coyote | 66.8 | 51.2 | 38.9 | 70.8 | 77.0 |
Wolf | 33.2 | 48.8 | 61.1 | 17.4 | 12.9 |
Dog | ---- | ---- | ---- | 11.7 | 10.2 |
3.0 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Coyote | 71.0 | 47.3 | 30.1 | 73.2 | 82.3 |
Wolf | 29.0 | 52.7 | 69.9 | 16.3 | 8.7 |
Dog | ---- | ---- | ---- | 10.6 | 9.0 |
7.0 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Coyote | 76.1 | 44.7 | 21.6 | 76.7 | 87.7 |
Wolf | 23.9 | 55.3 | 78.4 | 14.0 | 4.4 |
Dog | ---- | ---- | ---- | 9.3 | 7.9 |
10 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Coyote | 78.8 | 40.5 | 18.1 | 78.1 | 89.2 |
Wolf | 21.2 | 59.5 | 81.9 | 12.9 | 3.4 |
Dog | ---- | ---- | ---- | 9.0 | 7.4 |
C. | |||||
| Â | Â | Â | Coyote Ancestry Proportion: | ||
F ST | SNV Spacing | n SNV | Switch = 2 | Switch = 5 | Switch = 10 |
Any | Any | 48,036 | 67.8% | 70.0% | 71.3% |
Any | ≥ 0.5 Mb | 3,838 | 67.7% | 70.1% | 71.9% |
≥ 0.4 | Any | 7,875 | 69.4% | 72.6% | 75.4% |
≥ 0.4 | ≥ 0.5 Mb | 2,562 | 70.9% | 76.2% | 81.2% |