Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Crowdfunding the Azolla fern genome project: a grassroots approach

GigaScience20143:16

DOI: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-16

Received: 12 August 2014

Accepted: 18 September 2014

Published: 26 September 2014

Abstract

Much of science progresses within the tight boundaries of what is often seen as a “black box”. Though familiar to funding agencies, researchers and the academic journals they publish in, it is an entity that outsiders rarely get to peek into. Crowdfunding is a novel means that allows the public to participate in, as well as to support and witness advancements in science. Here we describe our recent crowdfunding efforts to sequence the Azolla genome, a little fern with massive green potential. Crowdfunding is a worthy platform not only for obtaining seed money for exploratory research, but also for engaging directly with the general public as a rewarding form of outreach.

Keywords

Azolla Cyanobacteria Fern Genome sequencing Nitrogen fixation Nostoc Op-ed Social media Symbiosis Crowdfunding

Background

Fern genomics: the final frontier. These are the voyages of Team Azolla. Its three-year mission: to explore strange new genome space, to seek out new genes and new functions, to boldly go where no fern has been sequenced before. – Modified from Captain James T. Kirk, Star Trek.

Most of the 470 million year history of plants on land belongs to bryophytes, lycophytes, ferns, and gymnosperms, which eventually yielded to the infamous dominance of flowering plants 90 million years ago. Ferns, the third largest of these five radiations—and the sister group to all seed plants—are the only lineage for which a reference genome has not yet been sequenced. That doesn’t sound right, does it? Without a fern genome, one cannot expect to fully comprehend the processes that govern the evolution of plant genes and genomes, and the patterns underlying major evolutionary transitions in land plants will remain elusive[1].

Important guidelines for selecting past candidates for genome sequencing have included their economic relevance to humans, their potential to answer important biological questions, and a small genome size. Azolla, a small genus of floating aquatic ferns (Figure 1), passes all three criteria with flying colors. First, Asian farmers have been using Azolla for thousands of years as a companion crop for rice—the world’s most important food staple[2]. Azolla is a natural nitrogen biofertilizer, a green manure, that bolsters rice productivity when these two plants are grown together[3, 4]. Furthermore, Azolla has been shown to be capable of hyperaccumulating a great variety of heavy metal pollutants, as well as decontaminating superfluous ammonium and phosphorus in wastewater[5, 6]. Second, fossil data from the Arctic Ocean demonstrate that around 50 million years ago, there was an enormous Azolla bloom, spanning nearly a one million-year-interval, that sequestered over 1012 tons of carbon and helped to shift the Early Eocene greenhouse world towards our present icehouse climate[7, 8]. Could Azolla help to do this again? Lastly, the 750 Mb genome of Azolla is tiny compared with other fern genomes, which are typically >10Gb[9], making it the perfect first genome to be sequenced in ferns. We believe that Azolla genomic studies will not only improve our understanding of plant evolution, but will also have broad implications for sustainable agriculture, phytoremediation and biofuel production.
Figure 1

Azolla is a small aquatic fern with an obligate bacterial endosymbiosis. A: hundreds of Azolla individuals can sit in the palm of your hand. B: close-up of an Azolla plant. Photo credit: Mark Smith and Dan Saftner of Macroscopic Solutions. C: Nostoc, symbiotic cyanobacteria (reddish brown filaments) living inside Azolla leaf cavities. Photo credit: Jerald Pinson.

Azolla is more than just a fern; it is a superorganism. Within specialized cavities enclosed by each of its tiny leaves, Azolla harbors an obligate symbiont, the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Nostoc (Anabaena) azollae (Figure 1C). The Azolla—Nostoc interaction is unique among all known plant—bacterial symbioses in that the association is maintained perpetually, even through sexual reproduction, so that the Nostoc cyanobiont is vertically transmitted to subsequent generations. In fact, N. azollae appears to have entirely lost its autonomy, as it cannot be cultured independently, that is when isolated from its host plant. A recent study revealed that N. azollae has undergone genomic downsizing, suggesting it might be in the early stages of evolving into a plant organelle devoted to nitrogen fixation[10]. However, this somewhat well characterized Azolla—Nostoc symbiosis is just the tip of the Azolla microbiome iceberg. In addition to Nostoc, an entire community of other bactobionts exists within Azolla’s specialized leaf cavities, including Arthrobacter, Agrobacterium and Corynebacterium. Interestingly, some of these non-Nostoc symbionts may also have nitrogen-fixing capabilities[11], suggesting that they may contribute to Azolla’s capacity for nitrogen fixation. This microbial community is very poorly characterized; the diversity and identity of these other bacteria, the degree of their interaction with the host, their mode of inheritance and patterns of co-evolution have not yet been investigated.

Our basic frustration of working with a plant lineage that the genomics world is blind to—one that seemed destined to be forever without appropriate genetic resources—drove us to propose the Azolla Genome Project. Here we aim to (1) generate a reference genome for Azolla, as well as for the metagenomes of its symbiotic bacteria; (2) resequence Azolla and its symbionts across all known Azolla species to study genomic co-evolution; (3) use comparative transcriptomics to infer the functionality of the symbionts and to identify candidate genes essential to this symbiosis and the nitrogen-fixation process; and (4) revisit plant genome and gene family evolution with this very first genome for the fern lineage.

Because this project repeatedly fell outside of the interest scope of major funding agencies, we decided to experiment with the “crowdfunding” route, seeking support and backing from the general public. It has been a fascinating ride, and in this commentary we share our experiences and argue that crowdfunding is a great medium for science outreach.

Main text

Our Azolla crowdfunding campaign

The ultimate goal of crowdfunding is to garner sufficient interest and enthusiasm from a large enough group of people over the Internet, so that they feel compelled to provide some measure of funding toward your project. Reaching out and convincing a total stranger more than 6,000 miles away to pitch in sounds like a daunting task, and indeed it was. We struggled and learned a lot as we went along.

For the past five years, people have been using websites, such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo, to crowdfund their creative arts, tech or gaming projects. We chose a relatively new platform, Experiment.com, because it is completely science oriented. One potential drawback is that Experiment has a much narrower audience compared to those of the large and hyper-diverse Kickstarter or Indiegogo platforms; therefore, one’s project could have less visibility to potential backers from outside of science. At Experiment, we set our campaign duration to 40 days and our funding goal to $15,000, with an objective to be able to draft an Azolla genome with 100X coverage[12].

Within our first naïve moments of launching the campaign, we seriously thought we could just kick off our shoes, sit back and watch the cash flow in. Well, we were completely mistaken. It was the start of a constant marathon of social media networking through email, Twitter, Facebook, and other resources we had never heard of before. Based on our experience, there are at least three major social network layers that one needs to penetrate. The first layer comprises immediate families, friends and colleagues; happily they were also among the first to donate (thanks Mom!). We asked them to tell their friends, families and colleagues so that we could extend our reach to the second layer—acquaintances. By repeating and extending this cycle, eventually our message reached the most important third layer, consisting of complete outsiders.

Into the second week of our crowdfunding campaign, we discovered the power of Reddit, an online news hub and discussion forum with enormous visitor traffic. We did a Reddit Science AMA (Ask Me Anything), where anyone could ask us any question in one afternoon about Azolla, ferns, plants—even career advice! We answered more than 200 questions that afternoon and got over 3,000 “upvotes”. The number of visitors to our crowdfunding website spiked during that afternoon and the following two days. To reach out and directly communicate with a broad and diverse audience, a Reddit AMA is something we highly recommend.

Obviously, not everyone surfs Reddit, or keeps up with the latest trends on social networks. We therefore also reached out using a more traditional news medium: newspapers. At the urging of Duke University’s Office of News & Communications, the junior author wrote an op-ed stressing the importance of Azolla research. It was immediately picked up by Canada’s highest-circulating newspaper, The Toronto Globe and Mail, as well as the Contra Costa Times of the San Francisco Bay area[13]. A fair number of our backers were from Canada, which we believe can be attributed to the op-ed in The Globe and Mail.

As this momentum began to build, we were also fortunate enough to get serious attention from the “big guys”—The Economist, USA Today and Scientific American[13]—who all reported on our efforts. Such coverage, without a doubt, gave us a tremendous push.

Our results

Within 40 days, we had 6,191 page views on our crowdfunding website, with visitors from 65 different countries. The top-five visitor sources included referrals from Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook, indicating that social networks and Reddit indeed played important roles. We raised a total of $7,160 from 123 backers, with individual donations ranging from $1 to $1,000. We calculated that 79% of the backers were from outside of our family-friends-colleagues-acquaintances circles, and they contributed 58% of the pledges.

Halfway through the campaign, and having reached one-third of our funding goal, our journey took an unexpected turn: BGI (formerly the Beijing Genomics Institute, but now based in Shenzhen) fully backed our project. BGI did not pledge actual money; instead they offered to fulfill all our sequencing needs free of charge. Such collaboration will allow us to go well beyond a single draft genome; we plan to also use genome/metagenome resequencing and comparative transcriptomics to further elucidate the genomic basis of symbiosis and nitrogen fixation.

But what did that mean for our crowdfunding project? We could not have created the media press and excitement that caught BGI’s interest without the help of our backers. Did we need to withdraw our campaign? We contacted the founders of Experiment who told us that because our BGI backing would allow us to meet the goals of our project, that they would indicate on the website that the project was a go. After announcing the backing from BGI, we continued to raise money, in the form of a “stretch-goal”, for fueling the next phase of our research. We will use the crowdfunded pledges to build a high-resolution genome map that will greatly enhance the final assembly of the reference genome.

Conclusion

Crowdfunding is a truly rewarding platform for engaging the public and obtaining seed money for exploratory research. It was a fantastic outreach and learning experience for us. We were forced to explain our ideas in a simple and interesting way that non-scientists would appreciate (otherwise no money!). The public endorsement and confirmation by the media that our project was of significance, and reflected what the public does care about, led to our vision being realized by BGI.

We will continue to share our latest research updates and plans with our 123 backers (affectionately known as “Team Azolla”), and we believe they are enjoying the ride as much as we are. With such a grassroots approach, we hope to demonstrate it is possible (not to mention important) to bring the general public closer to how the process of scientific inquiry works.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Carl Rothfels, Paul Wolf and Erin Sigel, with whom we first hatched the Azolla Genome Project, and also Joshua Der and David Barrington for insightful comments. We are grateful for all the media attention that this crowdfunding project attracted, and also to Tommy Stoughton, Gane Ka-Shu Wong, BGI, and of course all our backers for showing us the power of crowdfunding.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, Duke University

References

  1. Sessa EB, Banks JA, Barker MS, Der JP, Duffy AM, Graham SW, Hasebe M, Langdale J, Li F-W, Marchant DB, Pryer KM, Rothfels CJ, Roux SJ, Salmi ML, Sigel EM, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Stevenson DW, Wolf PG: Between two fern genomes. GigaScience. 2014, 3: 15-10.1186/2047-217X-3-15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Li J-Y, Wang J, Zeigler RS: The 3,000 rice genomes project: new opportunities and challenges for future rice research. GigaScience. 2014, 3: 8-10.1186/2047-217X-3-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Wagner GM: Azolla: a review of its biology and utilization. Bot Rev. 1997, 63: 1-26. 10.1007/BF02857915.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Brouwer P, Bräutigam A, Külahoglu C, Tazelaar AOE, Kurz S, Nierop KGJ, van der Werf A, Weber APM, Schluepmann H: Azolla domestication towards a biobased economy?. New Phytol. 2014, 202: 1069-1082. 10.1111/nph.12708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sood A, Uniyal PL, Prasanna R, Ahluwalia AS: Phytoremediation potential of aquatic macrophyte, Azolla. AMBIO. 2011, 41: 122-137.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Muradov N, Taha M, Miranda AF, Kadali K, Gujar A, Rochfort S, Stevenson T, Ball AS, Mouradov A: Dual application of duckweed and Azolla plants for wastewater treatment and renewable fuels and petrochemicals production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014, 7: 30-10.1186/1754-6834-7-30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinkhuis H, Schouten S, Collinson ME, Sluijs A, Damsté JSS, Dickens GR, Huber M, Cronin TM, Onodera J, Takahashi K, Bujak JP, Stein R, van der Burgh J, Eldrett JS, Harding IC, Lotter AF, Sangiorgi F, Cittert HVK-V, de Leeuw JW, Matthiessen J, Backman J, Moran K, the Expedition 302 Scientists: Episodic fresh surface waters in the Eocene Arctic Ocean. Nature. 2006, 441: 606-609. 10.1038/nature04692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Speelman EN, van Kempen MML, Barke J, Brinkhuis H, Reichart G-J, Smolders AJP, Roelofs JGM, Sangiorgi F, de Leeuw JW, Lotter AF, Sinninghe Damste JS: The Eocene Arctic Azolla bloom: environmental conditions, productivity and carbon drawdown. Geobiology. 2009, 7: 155-170. 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00195.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pryer KM, Schneider H, Zimmer EA, Banks JA: Deciding among green plants for whole genome studies. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7: 550-554. 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02375-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ran L, Larsson J, Vigil-Stenman T, Nylander JAA, Ininbergs K, Zheng W-W, Lapidus A, Lowry S, Haselkorn R, Bergman B: Genome erosion in a nitrogen-fixing vertically transmitted endosymbiotic multicellular cyanobacterium. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e11486-10.1371/journal.pone.0011486.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindblad P, Bergman B, Nierzwicki-Bauer SA: Immunocytochemical localization of nitrogenase in bacteria symbiotically associated with Azolla spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991, 57: 3637-3640.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Azolla, a Little Fern with Massive Green Potential.https://experiment.com/projects/azolla-a-little-fern-with-massive-green-potential,
  13. Azolla Genome Project in the News.http://www.azollagenome.net/in-the-news.html,

Copyright

© Li and Pryer; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.