CGtag: complete genomics toolkit and annotation in a cloud-based Galaxy
- Saskia Hiltemann†1, 2Email author,
- Hailiang Mei†3,
- Mattias de Hollander†4,
- Ivo Palli†1,
- Peter van der Spek†1,
- Guido Jenster†2 and
- Andrew Stubbs†1
© Hiltemann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 September 2013
Accepted: 18 January 2014
Published: 24 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Li|
|8 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anushka Brownley|
|18 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer HIllman-Jackson|
|2 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Saskia Hiltemann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anushka Brownley|
|8 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer HIllman-Jackson|
|16 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Saskia Hiltemann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/2047-217X-3-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.