Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification
© Zhou et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 December 2012
Accepted: 1 March 2013
Published: 27 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pierre Taberlet|
|14 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Davies|
|15 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonio Gonzalez Pena|
|4 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Xin Zhou|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonio Gonzalez Pena|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|27 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/2047-217X-2-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.