Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Galaxy tools to study genome diversity

  • Oscar C Bedoya-Reina1,
  • Aakrosh Ratan1, 2,
  • Richard Burhans1,
  • Hie Lim Kim1, 2,
  • Belinda Giardine1,
  • Cathy Riemer1,
  • Qunhua Li1,
  • Thomas L Olson3,
  • Thomas P LoughranJr3,
  • Bridgett M vonHoldt4,
  • George H Perry5,
  • Stephan C Schuster1, 2 and
  • Webb Miller1, 2Email author

DOI: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-17

Received: 24 July 2013

Accepted: 12 December 2013

Published: 30 December 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
24 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeremy Goecks
21 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Warren Johnson
2 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Li
8 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Webb Miller
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Li
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
30 Dec 2013 Article published 10.1186/2047-217X-2-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, Pennsylvania State University
Terreus Foundation
Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University
Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University